is a module or program that converts Pod to some other format (HTML,
plaintext, TeX, PostScript, RTF). A B<Pod processor> might be a
formatter or translator, or might be a program that does something
-else with the Pod (like wordcounting it, scanning for index points,
+else with the Pod (like counting words, scanning for index points,
etc.).
Pod content is contained in B<Pod blocks>. A Pod block starts with a
whitespace character (and there's no "=begin"..."=end" region around).
The "=begin I<identifier>" ... "=end I<identifier>" commands stop
-paragraphs that they surround from being parsed as data or verbatim
+paragraphs that they surround from being parsed as ordinary or verbatim
paragraphs, if I<identifier> doesn't begin with a colon. This
is discussed in detail in the section
L</About Data Paragraphs and "=beginE<sol>=end" Regions>.
=item "=begin formatname"
+=item "=begin formatname parameter"
+
This marks the following paragraphs (until the matching "=end
formatname") as being for some special kind of processing. Unless
"formatname" begins with a colon, the contained non-command
L</About Data Paragraphs and "=beginE<sol>=end" Regions>.
It is advised that formatnames match the regexp
-C<m/\A:?[-a-zA-Z0-9_]+\z/>. Implementors should anticipate future
-expansion in the semantics and syntax of the first parameter
-to "=begin"/"=end"/"=for".
+C<m/\A:?[−a−zA−Z0−9_]+\z/>. Everything following whitespace after the
+formatname is a parameter that may be used by the formatter when dealing
+with this region. This parameter must not be repeated in the "=end"
+paragraph. Implementors should anticipate future expansion in the
+semantics and syntax of the first parameter to "=begin"/"=end"/"=for".
=item "=end formatname"
This command, which should occur early in the document (at least
before any non-US-ASCII data!), declares that this document is
encoded in the encoding I<encodingname>, which must be
-an encoding name that L<Encoding> recognizes. (Encoding's list
-of supported encodings, in L<Encoding::Supported>, is useful here.)
+an encoding name that L<Encode> recognizes. (Encode's list
+of supported encodings, in L<Encode::Supported>, is useful here.)
If the Pod parser cannot decode the declared encoding, it
should emit a warning and may abort parsing the document
altogether.
A document having more than one "=encoding" line should be
considered an error. Pod processors may silently tolerate this if
the not-first "=encoding" lines are just duplicates of the
-first one (e.g., if there's a "=use utf8" line, and later on
-another "=use utf8" line). But Pod processors should complain if
+first one (e.g., if there's a "=encoding utf8" line, and later on
+another "=encoding utf8" line). But Pod processors should complain if
there are contradictory "=encoding" lines in the same document
(e.g., if there is a "=encoding utf8" early in the document and
"=encoding big5" later). Pod processors that recognize BOMs
Pod parsers should not, by default, try to coerce apostrophe (') and
quote (") into smart quotes (little 9's, 66's, 99's, etc), nor try to
turn backtick (`) into anything else but a single backtick character
-(distinct from an openquote character!), nor "--" into anything but
+(distinct from an open quote character!), nor "--" into anything but
two minus signs. They I<must never> do any of those things to text
in CE<lt>...> formatting codes, and never I<ever> to text in verbatim
paragraphs.
=item *
-It is up to individual Pod formatter to display good judgment when
+It is up to individual Pod formatter to display good judgement when
confronted with an unrenderable character (which is distinct from an
unknown EE<lt>thing> sequence that the parser couldn't resolve to
anything, renderable or not). It is good practice to map Latin letters
=item Fourth:
The section (AKA "item" in older perlpods), or undef if none. E.g.,
-in L<Getopt::Std/DESCRIPTION>, "DESCRIPTION" is the section. (Note
+in "LE<lt>Getopt::Std/DESCRIPTIONE<gt>", "DESCRIPTION" is the section. (Note
that this is not the same as a manpage section like the "5" in "man 5
crontab". "Section Foo" in the Pod sense means the part of the text
that's introduced by the heading or item whose text is "Foo".)
'url', # what sort of link
"http://www.perl.org/" # original content
+ L<Perl.org|http://www.perl.org/>
+ => "Perl.org", # link text
+ "http://www.perl.org/", # possibly inferred link text
+ "http://www.perl.org/", # name
+ undef, # section
+ 'url', # what sort of link
+ "Perl.org|http://www.perl.org/" # original content
+
Note that you can distinguish URL-links from anything else by the
fact that they match C<m/\A\w+:[^:\s]\S*\z/>. So
C<LE<lt>http://www.perl.comE<gt>> is a URL, but
=item *
-Previous versions of perlpod allowed for a C<LE<lt>sectionE<gt>> syntax
-(as in "C<LE<lt>Object AttributesE<gt>>"), which was not easily distinguishable
-from C<LE<lt>nameE<gt>> syntax. This syntax is no longer in the
-specification, and has been replaced by the C<LE<lt>"section"E<gt>> syntax
-(where the quotes were formerly optional). Pod parsers should tolerate
-the C<LE<lt>sectionE<gt>> syntax, for a while at least. The suggested
-heuristic for distinguishing C<LE<lt>sectionE<gt>> from C<LE<lt>nameE<gt>>
-is that if it contains any whitespace, it's a I<section>. Pod processors
-may warn about this being deprecated syntax.
+Previous versions of perlpod allowed for a C<LE<lt>sectionE<gt>> syntax (as in
+C<LE<lt>Object AttributesE<gt>>), which was not easily distinguishable from
+C<LE<lt>nameE<gt>> syntax and for C<LE<lt>"section"E<gt>> which was only
+slightly less ambiguous. This syntax is no longer in the specification, and
+has been replaced by the C<LE<lt>/sectionE<gt>> syntax (where the slash was
+formerly optional). Pod parsers should tolerate the C<LE<lt>"section"E<gt>>
+syntax, for a while at least. The suggested heuristic for distinguishing
+C<LE<lt>sectionE<gt>> from C<LE<lt>nameE<gt>> is that if it contains any
+whitespace, it's a I<section>. Pod processors should warn about this being
+deprecated syntax.
=back
Ut Enim
-But (for the forseeable future), Pod does not provide any way for Pod
+But (for the foreseeable future), Pod does not provide any way for Pod
authors to distinguish which grouping is meant by the above
"=item"-cluster structure. So formatters should format it like so:
projects / p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git / blobdiff