Perl provides a mechanism for alternative namespaces to protect
packages from stomping on each other's variables. In fact, there's
-really no such thing as a global variable in Perl . The package
+really no such thing as a global variable in Perl. The package
statement declares the compilation unit as being in the given
namespace. The scope of the package declaration is from the
declaration itself through the end of the enclosing block, C<eval>,
The symbol table for a package happens to be stored in the hash of that
name with two colons appended. The main symbol table's name is thus
-C<%main::>, or C<%::> for short. Likewise symbol table for the nested
+C<%main::>, or C<%::> for short. Likewise the symbol table for the nested
package mentioned earlier is named C<%OUTER::INNER::>.
The value in each entry of the hash is what you are referring to when you
local *main::foo = *main::bar;
local $main::{foo} = $main::{bar};
+(Be sure to note the B<vast> difference between the second line above
+and C<local $main::foo = $main::bar>. The former is accessing the hash
+C<%main::>, which is the symbol table of package C<main>. The latter is
+simply assigning scalar C<$bar> in package C<main> to scalar C<$foo> of
+the same package.)
+
You can use this to print out all the variables in a package, for
-instance. The standard but antequated F<dumpvar.pl> library and
+instance. The standard but antiquated F<dumpvar.pl> library and
the CPAN module Devel::Symdump make use of this.
Assignment to a typeglob performs an aliasing operation, i.e.,
@richard and @dick as separate arrays. Tricky, eh?
This mechanism may be used to pass and return cheap references
-into or from subroutines if you won't want to copy the whole
+into or from subroutines if you don't want to copy the whole
thing. It only works when assigning to dynamic variables, not
lexicals.
On return, the reference will overwrite the hash slot in the
symbol table specified by the *some_hash typeglob. This
is a somewhat tricky way of passing around references cheaply
-when you won't want to have to remember to dereference variables
+when you don't want to have to remember to dereference variables
explicitly.
Another use of symbol tables is for making "constant" scalars.
*PI = \3.14159265358979;
-Now you cannot alter $PI, which is probably a good thing all in all.
+Now you cannot alter C<$PI>, which is probably a good thing all in all.
This isn't the same as a constant subroutine, which is subject to
-optimization at compile-time. This isn't. A constant subroutine is one
-prototyped to take no arguments and to return a constant expression.
-See L<perlsub> for details on these. The C<use constant> pragma is a
+optimization at compile-time. A constant subroutine is one prototyped
+to take no arguments and to return a constant expression. See
+L<perlsub> for details on these. The C<use constant> pragma is a
convenient shorthand for these.
You can say C<*foo{PACKAGE}> and C<*foo{NAME}> to find out what name and
You gave me bar::baz
The C<*foo{THING}> notation can also be used to obtain references to the
-individual elements of *foo, see L<perlref>.
+individual elements of *foo. See L<perlref>.
Subroutine definitions (and declarations, for that matter) need
not necessarily be situated in the package whose symbol table they
=head2 Package Constructors and Destructors
-Three special subroutines act as package
-constructors and destructors. These are the C<BEGIN>, C<INIT>, and
-C<END> routines. The C<sub> is optional for these routines.
+Four special subroutines act as package constructors and destructors.
+These are the C<BEGIN>, C<CHECK>, C<INIT>, and C<END> routines. The
+C<sub> is optional for these routines.
A C<BEGIN> subroutine is executed as soon as possible, that is, the moment
it is completely defined, even before the rest of the containing file
has run, it is immediately undefined and any code it used is returned to
Perl's memory pool. This means you can't ever explicitly call a C<BEGIN>.
-Similar to C<BEGIN> blocks, C<INIT> blocks are run just before the
-Perl runtime begins execution. For example, the code generators
-documented in L<perlcc> make use of C<INIT> blocks to initialize
-and resolve pointers to XSUBs.
-
-An C<END> subroutine is executed as late as possible, that is, when
-the interpreter is being exited, even if it is exiting as a result of
-a die() function. (But not if it's polymorphing into another program
-via C<exec>, or being blown out of the water by a signal--you have to
-trap that yourself (if you can).) You may have multiple C<END> blocks
-within a file--they will execute in reverse order of definition; that is:
-last in, first out (LIFO).
+An C<END> subroutine is executed as late as possible, that is, after
+perl has finished running the program and just before the interpreter
+is being exited, even if it is exiting as a result of a die() function.
+(But not if it's polymorphing into another program via C<exec>, or
+being blown out of the water by a signal--you have to trap that yourself
+(if you can).) You may have multiple C<END> blocks within a file--they
+will execute in reverse order of definition; that is: last in, first
+out (LIFO). C<END> blocks are not executed when you run perl with the
+C<-c> switch, or if compilation fails.
Inside an C<END> subroutine, C<$?> contains the value that the program is
going to pass to C<exit()>. You can modify C<$?> to change the exit
value of the program. Beware of changing C<$?> by accident (e.g. by
running something via C<system>).
+Similar to C<BEGIN> blocks, C<INIT> blocks are run just before the
+Perl runtime begins execution, in "first in, first out" (FIFO) order.
+For example, the code generators documented in L<perlcc> make use of
+C<INIT> blocks to initialize and resolve pointers to XSUBs.
+
+Similar to C<END> blocks, C<CHECK> blocks are run just after the
+Perl compile phase ends and before the run time begins, in
+LIFO order. C<CHECK> blocks are again useful in the Perl compiler
+suite to save the compiled state of the program.
+
When you use the B<-n> and B<-p> switches to Perl, C<BEGIN> and
-C<END> work just as they do in B<awk>, as a degenerate case. As currently
-implemented (and subject to change, since its inconvenient at best),
-both C<BEGIN> and<END> blocks are run when you use the B<-c> switch
-for a compile-only syntax check, although your main code is not.
+C<END> work just as they do in B<awk>, as a degenerate case.
+Both C<BEGIN> and C<CHECK> blocks are run when you use the B<-c>
+switch for a compile-only syntax check, although your main code
+is not.
=head2 Perl Classes
=head2 Perl Modules
-A module is just a set of related function in a library file a Perl
-package with the same name as the file. It is specifically designed
-to be reusable by other modules or programs. It may do this by
-providing a mechanism for exporting some of its symbols into the
+A module is just a set of related functions in a library file, i.e.,
+a Perl package with the same name as the file. It is specifically
+designed to be reusable by other modules or programs. It may do this
+by providing a mechanism for exporting some of its symbols into the
symbol table of any package using it. Or it may function as a class
definition and make its semantics available implicitly through
method calls on the class and its objects, without explicitly
-exportating anything. Or it can do a little of both.
+exporting anything. Or it can do a little of both.
For example, to start a traditional, non-OO module called Some::Module,
create a file called F<Some/Module.pm> and start with this template:
package Some::Module; # assumes Some/Module.pm
use strict;
+ use warnings;
BEGIN {
use Exporter ();
- use vars qw($VERSION @ISA @EXPORT @EXPORT_OK %EXPORT_TAGS);
+ our ($VERSION, @ISA, @EXPORT, @EXPORT_OK, %EXPORT_TAGS);
# set the version for version checking
$VERSION = 1.00;
# as well as any optionally exported functions
@EXPORT_OK = qw($Var1 %Hashit &func3);
}
- use vars @EXPORT_OK;
+ our @EXPORT_OK;
# non-exported package globals go here
- use vars qw(@more $stuff);
+ our @more;
+ our $stuff;
# initialize package globals, first exported ones
$Var1 = '';
Perl packages may be nested inside other package names, so we can have
package names containing C<::>. But if we used that package name
-directly as a filename it would makes for unwieldy or impossible
+directly as a filename it would make for unwieldy or impossible
filenames on some systems. Therefore, if a module's name is, say,
C<Text::Soundex>, then its definition is actually found in the library
file F<Text/Soundex.pm>.
Perl modules always have a F<.pm> file, but there may also be
dynamically linked executables (often ending in F<.so>) or autoloaded
-subroutine definitions (often ending in F<.al> associated with the
+subroutine definitions (often ending in F<.al>) associated with the
module. If so, these will be entirely transparent to the user of
the module. It is the responsibility of the F<.pm> file to load
(or arrange to autoload) any additional functionality. For example,
although the POSIX module happens to do both dynamic loading and
-autoloading, but the user can say just C<use POSIX> to get it all.
+autoloading, the user can say just C<use POSIX> to get it all.
=head1 SEE ALSO