=head2 Packages
-Perl provides a mechanism for alternative namespaces to protect packages
-from stomping on each other's variables. In fact, there's really no such
-thing as a global variable in Perl (although some identifiers default
-to the main package instead of the current one). The package statement
-declares the compilation unit as
-being in the given namespace. The scope of the package declaration
-is from the declaration itself through the end of the enclosing block,
-C<eval>, C<sub>, or end of file, whichever comes first (the same scope
-as the my() and local() operators). All further unqualified dynamic
-identifiers will be in this namespace. A package statement only affects
-dynamic variables--including those you've used local() on--but
-I<not> lexical variables created with my(). Typically it would be
-the first declaration in a file to be included by the C<require> or
-C<use> operator. You can switch into a package in more than one place;
-it merely influences which symbol table is used by the compiler for the
-rest of that block. You can refer to variables and filehandles in other
-packages by prefixing the identifier with the package name and a double
-colon: C<$Package::Variable>. If the package name is null, the C<main>
-package is assumed. That is, C<$::sail> is equivalent to C<$main::sail>.
-
-(The old package delimiter was a single quote, but double colon
-is now the preferred delimiter, in part because it's more readable
-to humans, and in part because it's more readable to B<emacs> macros.
-It also makes C++ programmers feel like they know what's going on.)
-
-Packages may be nested inside other packages: C<$OUTER::INNER::var>. This
-implies nothing about the order of name lookups, however. All symbols
+Perl provides a mechanism for alternative namespaces to protect
+packages from stomping on each other's variables. In fact, there's
+really no such thing as a global variable in Perl. The package
+statement declares the compilation unit as being in the given
+namespace. The scope of the package declaration is from the
+declaration itself through the end of the enclosing block, C<eval>,
+or file, whichever comes first (the same scope as the my() and
+local() operators). Unqualified dynamic identifiers will be in
+this namespace, except for those few identifiers that if unqualified,
+default to the main package instead of the current one as described
+below. A package statement affects only dynamic variables--including
+those you've used local() on--but I<not> lexical variables created
+with my(). Typically it would be the first declaration in a file
+included by the C<do>, C<require>, or C<use> operators. You can
+switch into a package in more than one place; it merely influences
+which symbol table is used by the compiler for the rest of that
+block. You can refer to variables and filehandles in other packages
+by prefixing the identifier with the package name and a double
+colon: C<$Package::Variable>. If the package name is null, the
+C<main> package is assumed. That is, C<$::sail> is equivalent to
+C<$main::sail>.
+
+The old package delimiter was a single quote, but double colon is now the
+preferred delimiter, in part because it's more readable to humans, and
+in part because it's more readable to B<emacs> macros. It also makes C++
+programmers feel like they know what's going on--as opposed to using the
+single quote as separator, which was there to make Ada programmers feel
+like they knew what's going on. Because the old-fashioned syntax is still
+supported for backwards compatibility, if you try to use a string like
+C<"This is $owner's house">, you'll be accessing C<$owner::s>; that is,
+the $s variable in package C<owner>, which is probably not what you meant.
+Use braces to disambiguate, as in C<"This is ${owner}'s house">.
+
+Packages may themselves contain package separators, as in
+C<$OUTER::INNER::var>. This implies nothing about the order of
+name lookups, however. There are no relative packages: all symbols
are either local to the current package, or must be fully qualified
from the outer package name down. For instance, there is nowhere
-within package C<OUTER> that C<$INNER::var> refers to C<$OUTER::INNER::var>.
-It would treat package C<INNER> as a totally separate global package.
-
-Only identifiers starting with letters (or underscore) are stored in a
-package's symbol table. All other symbols are kept in package C<main>,
-including all of the punctuation variables like $_. In addition, when
-unqualified, the identifiers STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV, ARGVOUT, ENV,
-INC, and SIG are forced to be in package C<main>, even when used for other
-purposes than their builtin one. Note also that, if you have a package
-called C<m>, C<s>, or C<y>, then you can't use the qualified form of an
-identifier because it will be interpreted instead as a pattern match,
-a substitution, or a transliteration.
-
-(Variables beginning with underscore used to be forced into package
+within package C<OUTER> that C<$INNER::var> refers to
+C<$OUTER::INNER::var>. It would treat package C<INNER> as a totally
+separate global package.
+
+Only identifiers starting with letters (or underscore) are stored
+in a package's symbol table. All other symbols are kept in package
+C<main>, including all punctuation variables, like $_. In addition,
+when unqualified, the identifiers STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV,
+ARGVOUT, ENV, INC, and SIG are forced to be in package C<main>,
+even when used for other purposes than their built-in one. If you
+have a package called C<m>, C<s>, or C<y>, then you can't use the
+qualified form of an identifier because it would be instead interpreted
+as a pattern match, a substitution, or a transliteration.
+
+Variables beginning with underscore used to be forced into package
main, but we decided it was more useful for package writers to be able
to use leading underscore to indicate private variables and method names.
-$_ is still global though.)
+$_ is still global though. See also
+L<perlvar/"Technical Note on the Syntax of Variable Names">.
-Eval()ed strings are compiled in the package in which the eval() was
+C<eval>ed strings are compiled in the package in which the eval() was
compiled. (Assignments to C<$SIG{}>, however, assume the signal
handler specified is in the C<main> package. Qualify the signal handler
name if you wish to have a signal handler in a package.) For an
example, examine F<perldb.pl> in the Perl library. It initially switches
to the C<DB> package so that the debugger doesn't interfere with variables
-in the script you are trying to debug. At various points, however, it
+in the program you are trying to debug. At various points, however, it
temporarily switches back to the C<main> package to evaluate various
expressions in the context of the C<main> package (or wherever you came
from). See L<perldebug>.
The symbol table for a package happens to be stored in the hash of that
name with two colons appended. The main symbol table's name is thus
-C<%main::>, or C<%::> for short. Likewise symbol table for the nested
+C<%main::>, or C<%::> for short. Likewise the symbol table for the nested
package mentioned earlier is named C<%OUTER::INNER::>.
The value in each entry of the hash is what you are referring to when you
local *main::foo = *main::bar;
local $main::{foo} = $main::{bar};
+(Be sure to note the B<vast> difference between the second line above
+and C<local $main::foo = $main::bar>. The former is accessing the hash
+C<%main::>, which is the symbol table of package C<main>. The latter is
+simply assigning scalar C<$bar> in package C<main> to scalar C<$foo> of
+the same package.)
+
You can use this to print out all the variables in a package, for
-instance. The standard F<dumpvar.pl> library and the CPAN module
-Devel::Symdump make use of this.
+instance. The standard but antiquated F<dumpvar.pl> library and
+the CPAN module Devel::Symdump make use of this.
Assignment to a typeglob performs an aliasing operation, i.e.,
causes variables, subroutines, formats, and file and directory handles
accessible via the identifier C<richard> also to be accessible via the
identifier C<dick>. If you want to alias only a particular variable or
-subroutine, you can assign a reference instead:
+subroutine, assign a reference instead:
*dick = \$richard;
@richard and @dick as separate arrays. Tricky, eh?
This mechanism may be used to pass and return cheap references
-into or from subroutines if you won't want to copy the whole
+into or from subroutines if you don't want to copy the whole
thing. It only works when assigning to dynamic variables, not
lexicals.
On return, the reference will overwrite the hash slot in the
symbol table specified by the *some_hash typeglob. This
is a somewhat tricky way of passing around references cheaply
-when you won't want to have to remember to dereference variables
+when you don't want to have to remember to dereference variables
explicitly.
-Another use of symbol tables is for making "constant" scalars.
+Another use of symbol tables is for making "constant" scalars.
*PI = \3.14159265358979;
-Now you cannot alter $PI, which is probably a good thing all in all.
+Now you cannot alter C<$PI>, which is probably a good thing all in all.
This isn't the same as a constant subroutine, which is subject to
-optimization at compile-time. This isn't. A constant subroutine is one
-prototyped to take no arguments and to return a constant expression.
-See L<perlsub> for details on these. The C<use constant> pragma is a
+optimization at compile-time. A constant subroutine is one prototyped
+to take no arguments and to return a constant expression. See
+L<perlsub> for details on these. The C<use constant> pragma is a
convenient shorthand for these.
You can say C<*foo{PACKAGE}> and C<*foo{NAME}> to find out what name and
You gave me main::foo
You gave me bar::baz
-The *foo{THING} notation can also be used to obtain references to the
-individual elements of *foo, see L<perlref>.
+The C<*foo{THING}> notation can also be used to obtain references to the
+individual elements of *foo. See L<perlref>.
+
+Subroutine definitions (and declarations, for that matter) need
+not necessarily be situated in the package whose symbol table they
+occupy. You can define a subroutine outside its package by
+explicitly qualifying the name of the subroutine:
+
+ package main;
+ sub Some_package::foo { ... } # &foo defined in Some_package
+
+This is just a shorthand for a typeglob assignment at compile time:
+
+ BEGIN { *Some_package::foo = sub { ... } }
+
+and is I<not> the same as writing:
+
+ {
+ package Some_package;
+ sub foo { ... }
+ }
+
+In the first two versions, the body of the subroutine is
+lexically in the main package, I<not> in Some_package. So
+something like this:
+
+ package main;
+
+ $Some_package::name = "fred";
+ $main::name = "barney";
+
+ sub Some_package::foo {
+ print "in ", __PACKAGE__, ": \$name is '$name'\n";
+ }
+
+ Some_package::foo();
+
+prints:
+
+ in main: $name is 'barney'
+
+rather than:
+
+ in Some_package: $name is 'fred'
+
+This also has implications for the use of the SUPER:: qualifier
+(see L<perlobj>).
=head2 Package Constructors and Destructors
-There are two special subroutine definitions that function as package
-constructors and destructors. These are the C<BEGIN> and C<END>
-routines. The C<sub> is optional for these routines.
+Four special subroutines act as package constructors and destructors.
+These are the C<BEGIN>, C<CHECK>, C<INIT>, and C<END> routines. The
+C<sub> is optional for these routines.
A C<BEGIN> subroutine is executed as soon as possible, that is, the moment
it is completely defined, even before the rest of the containing file
has run, it is immediately undefined and any code it used is returned to
Perl's memory pool. This means you can't ever explicitly call a C<BEGIN>.
-An C<END> subroutine is executed as late as possible, that is, when
-the interpreter is being exited, even if it is exiting as a result of
-a die() function. (But not if it's polymorphing into another program
-via C<exec>, or being blown out of the water by a signal--you have to
-trap that yourself (if you can).) You may have multiple C<END> blocks
-within a file--they will execute in reverse order of definition; that is:
-last in, first out (LIFO).
-
-Inside an C<END> subroutine, C<$?> contains the value that the script is
+An C<END> subroutine is executed as late as possible, that is, after
+perl has finished running the program and just before the interpreter
+is being exited, even if it is exiting as a result of a die() function.
+(But not if it's polymorphing into another program via C<exec>, or
+being blown out of the water by a signal--you have to trap that yourself
+(if you can).) You may have multiple C<END> blocks within a file--they
+will execute in reverse order of definition; that is: last in, first
+out (LIFO). C<END> blocks are not executed when you run perl with the
+C<-c> switch, or if compilation fails.
+
+Inside an C<END> subroutine, C<$?> contains the value that the program is
going to pass to C<exit()>. You can modify C<$?> to change the exit
-value of the script. Beware of changing C<$?> by accident (e.g. by
+value of the program. Beware of changing C<$?> by accident (e.g. by
running something via C<system>).
-Note that when you use the B<-n> and B<-p> switches to Perl, C<BEGIN> and
-C<END> work just as they do in B<awk>, as a degenerate case. As currently
-implemented (and subject to change, since its inconvenient at best),
-both C<BEGIN> I<and> C<END> blocks are run when you use the B<-c> switch
-for a compile-only syntax check, although your main code is not.
+Similar to C<BEGIN> blocks, C<INIT> blocks are run just before the
+Perl runtime begins execution, in "first in, first out" (FIFO) order.
+For example, the code generators documented in L<perlcc> make use of
+C<INIT> blocks to initialize and resolve pointers to XSUBs.
+
+Similar to C<END> blocks, C<CHECK> blocks are run just after the
+Perl compile phase ends and before the run time begins, in
+LIFO order. C<CHECK> blocks are again useful in the Perl compiler
+suite to save the compiled state of the program.
+
+When you use the B<-n> and B<-p> switches to Perl, C<BEGIN> and
+C<END> work just as they do in B<awk>, as a degenerate case.
+Both C<BEGIN> and C<CHECK> blocks are run when you use the B<-c>
+switch for a compile-only syntax check, although your main code
+is not.
=head2 Perl Classes
-There is no special class syntax in Perl, but a package may function
+There is no special class syntax in Perl, but a package may act
as a class if it provides subroutines to act as methods. Such a
package may also derive some of its methods from another class (package)
-by listing the other package name in its global @ISA array (which
+by listing the other package name(s) in its global @ISA array (which
must be a package global, not a lexical).
For more on this, see L<perltoot> and L<perlobj>.
=head2 Perl Modules
-A module is just a package that is defined in a library file of
-the same name, and is designed to be reusable. It may do this by
-providing a mechanism for exporting some of its symbols into the symbol
-table of any package using it. Or it may function as a class
-definition and make its semantics available implicitly through method
-calls on the class and its objects, without explicit exportation of any
-symbols. Or it can do a little of both.
+A module is just a set of related functions in a library file, i.e.,
+a Perl package with the same name as the file. It is specifically
+designed to be reusable by other modules or programs. It may do this
+by providing a mechanism for exporting some of its symbols into the
+symbol table of any package using it. Or it may function as a class
+definition and make its semantics available implicitly through
+method calls on the class and its objects, without explicitly
+exporting anything. Or it can do a little of both.
-For example, to start a normal module called Some::Module, create
-a file called Some/Module.pm and start with this template:
+For example, to start a traditional, non-OO module called Some::Module,
+create a file called F<Some/Module.pm> and start with this template:
package Some::Module; # assumes Some/Module.pm
use strict;
+ use warnings;
BEGIN {
use Exporter ();
- use vars qw($VERSION @ISA @EXPORT @EXPORT_OK %EXPORT_TAGS);
+ our ($VERSION, @ISA, @EXPORT, @EXPORT_OK, %EXPORT_TAGS);
# set the version for version checking
$VERSION = 1.00;
# as well as any optionally exported functions
@EXPORT_OK = qw($Var1 %Hashit &func3);
}
- use vars @EXPORT_OK;
+ our @EXPORT_OK;
+
+ # exported package globals go here
+ our $Var1;
+ our %Hashit;
# non-exported package globals go here
- use vars qw(@more $stuff);
+ our @more;
+ our $stuff;
- # initalize package globals, first exported ones
+ # initialize package globals, first exported ones
$Var1 = '';
%Hashit = ();
END { } # module clean-up code here (global destructor)
-Then go on to declare and use your variables in functions
-without any qualifications.
-See L<Exporter> and the L<perlmodlib> for details on
-mechanics and style issues in module creation.
+ ## YOUR CODE GOES HERE
+
+ 1; # don't forget to return a true value from the file
+
+Then go on to declare and use your variables in functions without
+any qualifications. See L<Exporter> and the L<perlmodlib> for
+details on mechanics and style issues in module creation.
Perl modules are included into your program by saying
BEGIN { require Module; }
-All Perl module files have the extension F<.pm>. C<use> assumes this so
-that you don't have to spell out "F<Module.pm>" in quotes. This also
-helps to differentiate new modules from old F<.pl> and F<.ph> files.
-Module names are also capitalized unless they're functioning as pragmas,
-"Pragmas" are in effect compiler directives, and are sometimes called
-"pragmatic modules" (or even "pragmata" if you're a classicist).
+All Perl module files have the extension F<.pm>. The C<use> operator
+assumes this so you don't have to spell out "F<Module.pm>" in quotes.
+This also helps to differentiate new modules from old F<.pl> and
+F<.ph> files. Module names are also capitalized unless they're
+functioning as pragmas; pragmas are in effect compiler directives,
+and are sometimes called "pragmatic modules" (or even "pragmata"
+if you're a classicist).
The two statements:
differ from each other in two ways. In the first case, any double
colons in the module name, such as C<Some::Module>, are translated
into your system's directory separator, usually "/". The second
-case does not, and would have to be specified literally. The other difference
-is that seeing the first C<require> clues in the compiler that uses of
-indirect object notation involving "SomeModule", as in C<$ob = purge SomeModule>,
-are method calls, not function calls. (Yes, this really can make a difference.)
-
-Because the C<use> statement implies a C<BEGIN> block, the importation
-of semantics happens at the moment the C<use> statement is compiled,
+case does not, and would have to be specified literally. The other
+difference is that seeing the first C<require> clues in the compiler
+that uses of indirect object notation involving "SomeModule", as
+in C<$ob = purge SomeModule>, are method calls, not function calls.
+(Yes, this really can make a difference.)
+
+Because the C<use> statement implies a C<BEGIN> block, the importing
+of semantics happens as soon as the C<use> statement is compiled,
before the rest of the file is compiled. This is how it is able
to function as a pragma mechanism, and also how modules are able to
-declare subroutines that are then visible as list operators for
+declare subroutines that are then visible as list or unary operators for
the rest of the current file. This will not work if you use C<require>
-instead of C<use>. With require you can get into this problem:
+instead of C<use>. With C<require> you can get into this problem:
require Cwd; # make Cwd:: accessible
$here = Cwd::getcwd();
Perl packages may be nested inside other package names, so we can have
package names containing C<::>. But if we used that package name
-directly as a filename it would makes for unwieldy or impossible
+directly as a filename it would make for unwieldy or impossible
filenames on some systems. Therefore, if a module's name is, say,
C<Text::Soundex>, then its definition is actually found in the library
file F<Text/Soundex.pm>.
-Perl modules always have a F<.pm> file, but there may also be dynamically
-linked executables or autoloaded subroutine definitions associated with
-the module. If so, these will be entirely transparent to the user of
-the module. It is the responsibility of the F<.pm> file to load (or
-arrange to autoload) any additional functionality. The POSIX module
-happens to do both dynamic loading and autoloading, but the user can
-say just C<use POSIX> to get it all.
-
-For more information on writing extension modules, see L<perlxstut>
-and L<perlguts>.
+Perl modules always have a F<.pm> file, but there may also be
+dynamically linked executables (often ending in F<.so>) or autoloaded
+subroutine definitions (often ending in F<.al>) associated with the
+module. If so, these will be entirely transparent to the user of
+the module. It is the responsibility of the F<.pm> file to load
+(or arrange to autoload) any additional functionality. For example,
+although the POSIX module happens to do both dynamic loading and
+autoloading, the user can say just C<use POSIX> to get it all.
=head1 SEE ALSO
See L<perlmodlib> for general style issues related to building Perl
-modules and classes as well as descriptions of the standard library and
-CPAN, L<Exporter> for how Perl's standard import/export mechanism works,
-L<perltoot> for an in-depth tutorial on creating classes, L<perlobj>
-for a hard-core reference document on objects, and L<perlsub> for an
-explanation of functions and scoping.
+modules and classes, as well as descriptions of the standard library
+and CPAN, L<Exporter> for how Perl's standard import/export mechanism
+works, L<perltoot> and L<perltootc> for an in-depth tutorial on
+creating classes, L<perlobj> for a hard-core reference document on
+objects, L<perlsub> for an explanation of functions and scoping,
+and L<perlxstut> and L<perlguts> for more information on writing
+extension modules.
projects / p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git / blobdiff