SV** seq_ptr = AvARRAY(seq) + 1;
while(seq_items--) {
SV* const seqitem = *seq_ptr++;
- HE* const he = hv_fetch_ent(tails, seqitem, 0, 0);
- if(!he) {
- (void)hv_store_ent(tails, seqitem, newSViv(1), 0);
- }
- else {
+ /* LVALUE fetch will create a new undefined SV if necessary
+ */
+ HE* const he = hv_fetch_ent(tails, seqitem, 1, 0);
+ if(he) {
SV* const val = HeVAL(he);
+ /* This will increment undef to 1, which is what we
+ want for a newly created entry. */
sv_inc(val);
}
}
if(isarev) {
hv_iterinit(isarev);
while((iter = hv_iternext(isarev))) {
- SV* const revkey = hv_iterkeysv(iter);
- HV* revstash = gv_stashsv(revkey, 0);
+ I32 len;
+ const char* const revkey = hv_iterkey(iter, &len);
+ HV* revstash = gv_stashpvn(revkey, len, 0);
struct mro_meta* revmeta;
if(!revstash) continue;
SV* const sv = *svp++;
HV* mroisarev;
- HE *he = hv_fetch_ent(PL_isarev, sv, 0, 0);
- if(!he) {
- he = hv_store_ent(PL_isarev, sv, (SV*)newHV(), 0);
- }
+ HE *he = hv_fetch_ent(PL_isarev, sv, TRUE, 0);
+
+ /* That fetch should not fail. But if it had to create a new SV for
+ us, then we can detect it, because it will not be the correct type.
+ Probably faster and cleaner for us to free that scalar [very little
+ code actually executed to free it] and create a new HV than to
+ copy&paste [SIN!] the code from newHV() to allow us to upgrade the
+ new SV from SVt_NULL. */
+
mroisarev = (HV*)HeVAL(he);
+ if(SvTYPE(mroisarev) != SVt_PVHV) {
+ SvREFCNT_dec(mroisarev);
+ mroisarev = newHV();
+ HeVAL(he) = (SV *)mroisarev;
+ }
+
/* This hash only ever contains PL_sv_yes. Storing it over itself is
almost as cheap as calling hv_exists, so on aggregate we expect to
save time by not making two calls to the common HV code for the
hv_iterinit(isarev);
while((iter = hv_iternext(isarev))) {
- SV* const revkey = hv_iterkeysv(iter);
- HV* const revstash = gv_stashsv(revkey, 0);
+ I32 len;
+ const char* const revkey = hv_iterkey(iter, &len);
+ HV* const revstash = gv_stashpvn(revkey, len, 0);
struct mro_meta* mrometa;
if(!revstash) continue;