? sub () { 0 }
: sub () { 1 };
+ *DEBUG_NO_META = ($ENV{DEBUG_NO_META})
+ ? sub () { 1 }
+ : sub () { 0 };
+
# this is either part of core or set up appropriately by MRO::Compat
*check_package_cache_flag = \&mro::get_pkg_gen;
}
-our $VERSION = '1.00';
+our $VERSION = '1.08';
our $XS_VERSION = $VERSION;
$VERSION = eval $VERSION;
our $AUTHORITY = 'cpan:STEVAN';
require XSLoader;
XSLoader::load( __PACKAGE__, $XS_VERSION );
-
{
# Metaclasses are singletons, so we cache them here.
# there is no need to worry about destruction though
))
);
-Class::MOP::Method->meta->add_method('clone' => sub {
- my $self = shift;
- my $clone = $self->meta->clone_object($self, @_);
- $clone->_set_original_method($self);
- return $clone;
-});
-
## --------------------------------------------------------
## Class::MOP::Method::Wrapped
| A |<----| B |
+---------+ +---------+
+In actuality, I<all> of a class's metaclasses must be compatible,
+not just the class metaclass. That includes the instance, attribute,
+and method metaclasses, as well as the constructor and destructor
+classes.
+
+C<Class::MOP> will attempt to fix some simple types of
+incompatibilities. If all the metaclasses for the parent class are
+I<subclasses> of the child's metaclasses then we can simply replace
+the child's metaclasses with the parent's. In addition, if the child
+is missing a metaclass that the parent has, we can also just make the
+child use the parent's metaclass.
+
As I said this is a highly esoteric topic and one you will only run
into if you do a lot of subclassing of L<Class::MOP::Class>. If you
are interested in why this is an issue see the paper I<Uniform and
=item L<http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/misc/Perl-MetaModel/>
-=item L<http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/perl5/Perl6-ObjectSpace>
+=item L<http://github.com/perl6/p5-modules/tree/master/Perl6-ObjectSpace/>
=back