the case with a minor point update.
It is highly recommended that you become familar with the L<Plack> ecosystem
-and documentation. Being able to take advantage of L<Plack> development and
-middleware is a major bonus to this upgrade.
+and documentation. Being able to take advantage of L<Plack> development and
+middleware is a major bonus to this upgrade. Documentation about how to
+take advantage of L<Plack::Middleware> by writing your own C<< .psgi >> file
+is contained in L<Catalyst::PSGI>.
If you have created a custom subclass of L<Catalyst:Engine> you will need to
convert it to be a subclass of L<Plack::Handler>.
as required.
L<Catalyst::Engine::Apache2::MP19>, is however no longer supported, as Plack
-does not support mod_perl version 1.99??? FIXME - is this true?
+does not support mod_perl version 1.99
=head2 Upgrading the HTTP Engine
If you were using L<Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::Prefork> then L<Starman>
is automatically loaded.
-XXX FIXME - note how to run Starman with different options.
+If you were customising your server script to pass opttions to the prefork engine,
+then this is no longer supported. The recommended route to implement this functionality
+is to write a simple .psgi file for your application, then use the L<plackup> untility.
=head2 Upgrading the PSGI Engine
If you were using L<Catalyst::Engine::PSGI> this new release supercedes this
engine in supporting L<Plack>. By default the Engine is now always L<Plack>.
As a result, you can stop depending on L<Catalyst::Engine::PSGI> in your
-C<Makefile.PL>. Additionally, if you have an C<app.psgi> script you no longer
+C<Makefile.PL>.
+
+Applications that were using L<Catalyst::Engine::PSGI>
+previously should entirely continue to work in this release with no changes.
+
+However, if you have an C<app.psgi> script, then you no longer
need to specify the PSGI engine. Instead, the L<Catalyst> application class
-now has a new method C<psgi_app> which returns a L<Plack> compatible coderef.
+now has a new method C<psgi_app> which returns a L<PSGI> compatible coderef
+which you can wrap in middleware of your choice.
+
+Catalyst will use the .psgi for your application if it is located in the C<home>
+directory of the application
For example, if you were using L<Catalyst::Engine::PSGI> in the past, you will
-have written (or generated) an C<app.psgi> file similar to this one:
+have written (or generated) a C<script/myapp.psgi> file similar to this one:
use Plack::Builder;
use MyCatalytApp;
sub { MyCatalystApp->run(@_) };
};
-Instead, you should now just do:
+Instead, you now say:
use Plack::Builder;
use MyCatalystApp;
builder {
enable ... #enable your desired middleware
- MyCatalystApp->raw_psgi_app;
+ MyCatalystApp->psgi_app;
};
-Applications that were using and deploying via L<Catalyst::Engine::PSGI>
-previously should entirely continue to work in this release with no changes,
-however if you were using Catalyst::Engine::PSGI previously, then this is
-not compatible with L<Catalyst::Test> in the new version, and instead of
-running a test server
+In the simplest case:
+
+ MyCatalystApp->setup_engine('PSGI');
+ my $app = sub { MyCatalystApp->run(@_) }
+
+becomes
+
+ MyCatalystApp->setup_engine('PSGI');
+ my $app = MyCatalystApp->psgi_app(@_);
+
+B<NOT>:
+
+ my $app = sub { MyCatalystApp->psgi_app(@_) };
+ # If you make ^^ this mistake, your app won't work, and will confuse the hell out of you!
+
+You can now rename C<< script/myapp.psgi >> to C<< myapp.psgi >>, and the built-in
+Catalyst scripts, and your test suite will start using your .psgi file.
+
+B<NOTE:> If you rename your .psgi file without these modifications, then any tests run via
+L<Catalyst::Test> will not be compatible with the new release, and will result in
+the development server starting, rather than the expected test running.
=head2 Engines which are known broken
=item Catalyst::Engine::Wx
+=item Catalyst::Engine::Zeus
+
+=item Catalyst::Engine::JobQueue::POE
+
+=item Catalyst::Engine::XMPP2
+
+=item Catalyst::Engine::SCGI
+
=back
=head2 Engines with unknown status
The following engines have untested or unknown compatibility. Reports are
highly welcomed:
- Catalyst::Engine::Embeddable - needs testing, should work?
- Catalyst::Engine::XMPP2
- Catalyst::Engine::SCGI
- Catalyst::Engine::Mojo
- Catalyst::Engine::Zeus - broken for ages
- Catalyst::Engine::JobQueue::POE - broken for ages
- Catalyst::Engine::Stomp - fixed
- Catalyst::Engine::Server (Marked as Deprecated)
- Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::POE (Marked as Deprecated)
+=over
+
+=item Catalyst::Engine::Mojo
+
+=item Catalyst::Engine::Server (Marked as Deprecated)
+
+=item Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::POE (Marked as Deprecated)
+
+=back
+
+=head2 Specifying the engine in the call to ->setup
+
+XXX FIXME
=head2 Using middleware
-XXX Should this be here or elsewhere?
+XXX FIXME Should this be here or elsewhere?
=head2 Making an app.psgi file
+FIXME
+
=head2 Running with plackup?
+FIXME
+
+=head2 Tests in 5.89
+
+Tests should generally work the same in Catalyst 5.89, however there are some differences.
+
+Previously, if using L<Catalyst::Test> and doing local requests (against a local server),
+if the application threw an exception then this exception propagated into the test.
+
+This behaviour has been removed, and now a 500 response will be returned to the test.
+This change unifies behaviour, to make local test requests behave similarly to remote
+requests.
+
=head1 Upgrading to Catalyst 5.80
Most applications and plugins should run unaltered on Catalyst 5.80.
To be able to generate a linear @ISA, the list of superclasses for each
class must be resolvable using the C3 algorithm. Unfortunately, when
superclasses are being used as mixins (to add functionality used in your class),
-and with multiple inheritence, it is easy to get this wrong.
+and with multiple inheritance, it is easy to get this wrong.
Most common is the case of: