-TODO for brach namespace_handling_refactor:
+# Known Bugs:
-- refactor code in
- * Catalyst::Dispatcher::get_containers # No Idea
- * Catalyst::Dispatcher::dispatch_type # DONE
+ - Bug ->go or ->visit causes actions which have Args or CaptureArgs called
+ twice when called via ->go or ->visit.
- * Catalyst::Controller::_parse_ActionClass_attr # DONE
- * Catalyst::Dispatcher::_load_dispatch_types # DONE
- * Catalyst::setup_plugins # DONE
- to use the same namespacing method
+ Test app: http://github.com/bobtfish/catalyst-app-bug-go_chain/tree/master
-- Ok, so can you add tests for ->config(actions => { foo => { ActionClass => '+Bar' }});
\ No newline at end of file
+# Compatibility warnings to add:
+
+ - $self->config should warn as config should only ever be called as a
+ class method (TESTS).
+
+# Proposed functionality / feature additions:
+
+## Log setup needs to be less lame
+
+So Catalyst::Plugin::Log::* can die
+in a fire. Having $c->log_class would be a good start. kane volunteered
+to do some of this.
+
+Simple example: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Colorful should just be a
+subclass of Catalyst::Log, no ::Plugin:: needed.
+
+See also: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Dispatch and
+http://github.com/willert/catalyst-plugin-log4perl-simple/tree
+
+# REFACTORING
+
+## The horrible hack for plugin setup - replacing it:
+
+ * Have a look at the Devel::REPL BEFORE_PLUGIN stuff
+ I wonder if what we need is that combined with plugins-as-roles
+
+## App / ctx split:
+
+ NOTE - these are notes that t0m thought up after doing back compat for
+ catalyst_component_class, may be inaccurate, wrong or missing things
+ bug mst (at least) to correct before trying more than the first 2
+ steps. Please knock yourself out on the first two however :)
+
+ - Eliminate actions in MyApp from the main test suite
+ - Uncomment warning in C::C::register_action_methods, add tests it works
+ by mocking out the logging..
+ - Remove MyApp @ISA controller (ask metaclass if it has attributes, and if
+ so you need back compat :/)
+ - Make Catalyst::Context, move the per request stuff in there, handles from
+ main app class to delegate
+ - Make an instance of the app class which is a global variable
+ - Make new instance of the context class, not the app class per-request
+ - Remove the components as class data, move to instance data on the app
+ class (you probably have to do this for _all_ the class data, good luck!)
+ - Make it possible for users to spin up different instances of the app class
+ (with different config etc each)
+ - Profit! (Things like changing the complete app config per vhost, i.e.
+ writing a config loader / app class role which dispatches per vhost to
+ differently configured apps is piss easy)
+
+## GSOC
+
+### Final steps for GSOC
+
+##### Things that work:
+
+##### Things that don't work:
+
+##### Need planning, have questions:
+
+### Next steps - planned:
+
+ - some imports need to get the importing package in Catalyst::IOC
+
+ - test values directly instead of serializing them over http in t/lib/TestCustomContainer.pm
+
+ - 16:01 < shadowpaste> "t0m" at 217.168.150.38 pasted "more explicit? thoughts?" (13 lines) at http://paste.scsys.co.uk/131520
+
+ - make ACCEPT_CONTEXT and COMPONENT optional in Catalyst::IOC::BlockInjection and Catalyst::IOC::ConstructorInjection
+ - Create COMPONENTSingleton life cycle
+
+ - Back compat for Catalyst.pm moved methods (locate_components)
+
+ - Test custom container
+ - writing some tests which verify that the models you think should be
+ there are there, and that they received their dependencies as arguments
+ - i.e. Model::Bar should get params { foo => $model_foo } when being
+ constructed, etc
+ - Need to test that if you have a standard component Frotz
+ and a customized component Fnar, and Fnar depends on Frotz
+ - And yeah, some tests that the customised components actually work via
+ $c->model('Foo'), and that COMPONENT is called (or not called)
+ as appropiate and that ACCEPT_CONTEXT is called (or not) as appropriate
+
+### Next steps - less planned:
+
+ - Creating service()-like sugar for component
+
+ - Test cases for extending the container in an application.
+ - Using the sugar added in the previous item
+ - Test when Model::Foo depends_on Model::Bar
+ - Test for component Foo => ( lifecycle => 'Singleton', class => 'My::External::Class', dependencies => { config => depends_on("config") } )
+ - Fix ^^ so that you can get your component's namespaced config nicely.
+
+ - Tests for using the container outside of Catalyst
+ - Custom container which adds some (very simple) services which are initialized from
+ the application config file (note plain services, not components)
+ - Depend on (and test) these inside Catalyst
+ - Test loading container outside Catalyst, and these services working
+ - Test Catalyst / MyApp is not loaded
+
+#### Extending my app, notes
+
+Basically try to implement something like this (starting out without the sugar!), and see how it breaks
+and what needs to be done to fix it!
+
+##### Eventual syntax
+
+package MyApp::Container;
+use Catalyst::IOC;
+
+ container $self, as {
+ container model => as {
+ component Foo => (); # As per default!
+ component Bar => (dependencies => ['/model/Foo']); # Magic!
+ component Baz => ( lifecycle => 'InstancePerContext );
+ component Quux => ( lifecycle => 'Singleton' ); # ACCEPT_CONTEXT not called
+ # Catalyst::Model::Adaptor example
+ conponent Fnar => ( lifecycle => 'Singleton', class => 'My::External::Class', dependencies => { config => depends_on('config')} );
+ # ^^ FIXME - gets whole config, not Model::Foo
+ # There should be a 'nice' way to get the 'standard' config
+ };
+ # Note - implementation of BB may need to be changed to support making sure existing
+ # services actually get overridden. not sure how the default container behaves when doing that
+ # above code would build the constructor injection as it currently does,
+ # defaulting to the class name in the right namespace as declared by the surrounding container
+ # as well as adding using the catalyst-specific service class
+ };
+
+1;
+
+### To polish off / t0m review
+
+ locate_components service vs setup_components method
+ - can we be more lazy?
+ - should setup_components be a service that things like the ->component lookup
+ can depend on?
+
+### Known issues
+
+ - Broken $instance->expand_modules() in setup_components and figure
+ out later how to bring it back
+
+ - expand_component_module
+
+ - People wrapping locate_components in Catalyst.pm