does not allow its malloc functions to be fully replaced with custom
versions.
+=item -DPERL_DEBUGGING_MSTATS
+
+This flag enables debugging mstats, which is required to use the
+Devel::Peek::mstat() function. You cannot enable this unless you are
+using Perl's malloc, so a typical Configure command would be
+
+ sh Configure -Accflags=-DPERL_DEBUGGING_MSTATS -Dusemymalloc='y'
+
+to enable this option.
+
=back
=head2 Building a debugging perl
DynaLoader extension; you should just build the stub dl_none.xs
version. (Configure will suggest this as the default.)
-In summary, here are the Configure command-line variables you can set
-to turn off various extensions. All others are included by default.
+To disable certain extensions so that they are not built, use
+the -Dnoextensions=... and -Donlyextensions=... options. They both
+accept a space-separated list of extensions. The extensions listed
+in C<noextensions> are removed from the list of extensions to build,
+while the C<onlyextensions> is rather more severe and builds only
+the listed extensions. The latter should be used with extreme caution
+since certain extensions are used by many other extensions and modules:
+such modules include Fcntl and IO. The order of processing these
+options is first C<only> (if present), then C<no> (if present).
+
+Another, older way to turn off various extensions (which is still good
+to know if you have to work with older Perl) exists. Here are the
+Configure command-line variables you can set to turn off various
+extensions. All others are included by default.
DB_File i_db
DynaLoader (Must always be included as a static extension)
functionality.
NOTE: Perl is routinely built using cross-compilation
- in the EPOC environment but the solutions from there
- can't directly be used elsewhere.
-
-The one environment where cross-compilation has successfully been used
-as of this writing is the Compaq iPAQ running ARM Linux. The build
-host was Intel Linux, the networking setup was PPP + SSH. The exact
-setup details are beyond the scope of this document, see
-http://www.handhelds.org/ for more information.
+ in the EPOC environment, in the WinCE, and in the OpenZaurus
+ project, but all those use something slightly different setup
+ than what described here. For the WinCE setup, read the
+ wince/README.compile. For the OpenZaurus setup, read the
+ Cross/README.
+
+The one environment where this cross-compilation setup has
+successfully been used as of this writing is the Compaq iPAQ running
+ARM Linux. The build host was Intel Linux, the networking setup was
+PPP + SSH. The exact setup details are beyond the scope of this
+document, see http://www.handhelds.org/ for more information.
To run Configure in cross-compilation mode the basic switch is
C<-Dusecrosscompile>.
tries to exercise the regular expression subsystem quite thoroughly,
and may well be far more demanding than your normal usage.
-=item Test failures from lib/ftmp-security saying "system possibly insecure"
-
-Firstly, test failures from the ftmp-security are not necessarily
-serious or indicative of a real security threat. That being said,
-they bear investigating.
-
-The tests may fail for the following reasons. Note that each of the
-tests is run both in the building directory and the temporary
-directory, as returned by File::Spec->tmpdir().
-
-(1) If the directory the tests are being run is owned by somebody else
-than the user running the tests, or root (uid 0). This failure can
-happen if the Perl source code distribution is unpacked in a way that
-the user ids in the distribution package are used as-is. Some tar
-programs do this.
-
-(2) If the directory the tests are being run in is writable by group
-or by others (remember: with UNIX/POSIX semantics, write access to
-a directory means the right to add/remove files in that directory),
-and there is no sticky bit set in the directory. 'Sticky bit' is
-a feature used in some UNIXes to give extra protection to files: if
-the bit is on a directory, no one but the owner (or the root) can remove
-that file even if the permissions of the directory would allow file
-removal by others. This failure can happen if the permissions in the
-directory simply are a bit too liberal for the tests' liking. This
-may or may not be a real problem: it depends on the permissions policy
-used on this particular directory/project/system/site. This failure
-can also happen if the system either doesn't support the sticky bit
-(this is the case with many non-UNIX platforms: in principle
-File::Temp should know about these platforms and skip the tests), or
-if the system supports the sticky bit but for some reason or reasons
-it is not being used. This is for example the case with HP-UX: as of
-HP-UX release 11.00, the sticky bit is very much supported, but HP-UX
-doesn't use it on its /tmp directory as shipped. Also, as with the
-permissions, some local policy might dictate that the stickiness is
-not used.
+=item Failures from lib/File/Temp/t/security saying "system possibly insecure"
+
+First, such warnings are not necessarily serious or indicative of a
+real security threat. That being said, they bear investigating.
+
+Note that each of the tests is run twice. The first time is in the
+directory returned by File::Spec->tmpdir() (often /tmp on Unix
+systems), and the second time in the directory from which the test was
+run (usually the 't' directory, if the test was run as part of 'make
+test').
+
+The tests may fail for the following reasons:
+
+(1) If the directory the tests are being run in is owned by somebody
+other than the user running the tests, or by root (uid 0).
+
+This failure can happen if the Perl source code distribution is
+unpacked in such a way that the user ids in the distribution package
+are used as-is. Some tar programs do this.
+
+(2) If the directory the tests are being run in is writable by group or
+by others, and there is no sticky bit set for the directory. (With
+UNIX/POSIX semantics, write access to a directory means the right to
+add or remove files in that directory. The 'sticky bit' is a feature
+used in some UNIXes to give extra protection to files: if the bit is
+set for a directory, no one but the owner (or root) can remove that
+file even if the permissions would otherwise allow file removal by
+others.)
+
+This failure may or may not be a real problem: it depends on the
+permissions policy used on this particular system. This failure can
+also happen if the system either doesn't support the sticky bit (this
+is the case with many non-UNIX platforms: in principle File::Temp
+should know about these platforms and skip the tests), or if the system
+supports the sticky bit but for some reason or reasons it is not being
+used. This is, for example, the case with HP-UX: as of HP-UX release
+11.00, the sticky bit is very much supported, but HP-UX doesn't use it
+on its /tmp directory as shipped. Also, as with the permissions, some
+local policy might dictate that the stickiness is not used.
(3) If the system supports the POSIX 'chown giveaway' feature and if
any of the parent directories of the temporary file back to the root
directory are 'unsafe', using the definitions given above in (1) and
-(2).
+(2). For Unix systems, this is usually not an issue if you are
+building on a local disk. See the documentation for the File::Temp
+module for more information about 'chown giveaway'.
See the documentation for the File::Temp module for more information
-about the various security aspects.
+about the various security aspects of temporary files.
=back
projects / p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git / blobdiff