=pod =head1 NAME Moose::Cookbook::Recipe4 - Subtypes, and modeling a simple B class hierarchy =head1 SYNOPSIS package Address; use strict; use warnings; use Moose; use Moose::Util::TypeConstraints; use Locale::US; use Regexp::Common 'zip'; my $STATES = Locale::US->new; subtype USState => as Str => where { (exists $STATES->{code2state}{uc($_)} || exists $STATES->{state2code}{uc($_)}) }; subtype USZipCode => as Value => where { /^$RE{zip}{US}{-extended => 'allow'}$/ }; has 'street' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str'); has 'city' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str'); has 'state' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'USState'); has 'zip_code' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'USZipCode'); package Company; use strict; use warnings; use Moose; use Moose::Util::TypeConstraints; has 'name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'address' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Address'); has 'employees' => (is => 'rw', isa => subtype ArrayRef => where { (blessed($_) && $_->isa('Employee') || return) for @$_; 1 }); sub BUILD { my ($self, $params) = @_; if ($params->{employees}) { foreach my $employee (@{$params->{employees}}) { $employee->company($self); } } } after 'employees' => sub { my ($self, $employees) = @_; if (defined $employees) { foreach my $employee (@{$employees}) { $employee->company($self); } } }; package Person; use strict; use warnings; use Moose; has 'first_name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'last_name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'middle_initial' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', predicate => 'has_middle_initial'); has 'address' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Address'); sub full_name { my $self = shift; return $self->first_name . ($self->has_middle_initial ? ' ' . $self->middle_initial . '. ' : ' ') . $self->last_name; } package Employee; use strict; use warnings; use Moose; extends 'Person'; has 'title' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'company' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Company', weak_ref => 1); override 'full_name' => sub { my $self = shift; super() . ', ' . $self->title }; =head1 DESCRIPTION In this recipe we introduce the C keyword, and show how that can be useful for specifying specific type constraints without having to build an entire class to represent them. We will also show how this feature can be used to leverage the usefulness of CPAN modules. In addition to this, we will also introduce another attribute option as well. Lets first get into the C features. In the B
class we have defined two subtypes. The first C uses the L module, which provides two hashes which can be used to do existence checks for state names and their two letter state codes. It is a very simple, and very useful module, and perfect to use in a C constraint. my $STATES = Locale::US->new; subtype USState => as Str => where { (exists $STATES->{code2state}{uc($_)} || exists $STATES->{state2code}{uc($_)}) }; Because we know that states will be passed to us as strings, we can make C a subtype of the built-in type constraint C. This will assure that anything which is a C will also pass as a C. Next, we create a constraint specializer using the C keyword. The value being checked against in the C clause can be found in the C<$_> variable (1). Our constraint specializer will then look to see if the string given is either a state name or a state code. If the string meets this criteria, then the constraint will pass, otherwise it will fail. We can now use this as we would any built-in constraint, like so: has 'state' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'USState'); The C accessor will now check all values against the C constraint, thereby only allowing valid state names or state codes to be stored in the C slot. The next C, does pretty much the same thing using the L module, and constrainting the C slot. subtype USZipCode => as Value => where { /^$RE{zip}{US}{-extended => 'allow'}$/ }; Using subtypes can save a lot of un-needed abstraction by not requiring you to create many small classes for these relatively simple values. It also allows you to define these constraints and share them among many different classes (avoiding unneeded duplication) because type constraints are stored by string in a global registry and always accessible to C. With these two subtypes and some attributes, we pretty much define as much as we need for a basic B
class. Next we define a basic B class, which itself has an address. As we saw in earlier recipes, we can use the C
type constraint that Moose automatically created for us. has 'address' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Address'); A company also needs a name, so we define that too. has 'name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); Here we introduce another attribute option, the C option. This option tells Moose that C is a required parameter in the B constructor, and that the C accessor cannot accept an undefined value for the slot. The result is that C should always have a value. The next attribute option is not actually a new one, but a new varient of options we have already introduced. has 'employees' => (is => 'rw', isa => subtype ArrayRef => where { (blessed($_) && $_->isa('Employee') || return) for @$_; 1 }); Here, instead of passing a string to the C option, we are passing an anyonomous subtype of the C type constraint. This subtype basically checks that all the values in the ARRAY ref are instance of the B class. Now this will assure that our employee's will all be of the correct type, however, the B object (which we will see in a moment) also maintains a reference back to it's associated B. In order to maintain this relationship (and preserve the referential integrity of our objects), we need to do some processing of the employees over and above that of the type constraint check. This is accomplished in two places. First we need to be sure that any employees array passed to the constructor is properly initialized. For this we can use the C method (2). sub BUILD { my ($self, $params) = @_; if ($params->{employees}) { foreach my $employee (@{$params->{employees}}) { $employee->company($self); } } } The C method will have run after the intial type constraint check, so we can do just a basic existence check on the C param here, and assume that if it does exist, it is both an ARRAY ref and full of I instances of B. The next place we need to address is the C read/write accessor (see the C attribute declaration above). This accessor will properly check the type constraint, but we need to add so additional behavior. For this we use an C method modifier like so: after 'employees' => sub { my ($self, $employees) = @_; if (defined $employees) { foreach my $employee (@{$employees}) { $employee->company($self); } } }; Again, as with the C method, we know that the type constraint check has already happened, so we can just check for defined-ness on the C<$employees> argument. At this point, our B class is complete. Next comes our B class and it's subclass the previously mentioned B class. The B class should be obvious to you at this point. It has a few C attributes, and the C slot has an additional C method (which we saw in the previous recipe with the B class). Next the B class, this too should be pretty obvious at this point. It requires a C, and maintains a weakend reference to a B<Company> instance. The only new item, which we have seen before in examples, but never in the recipe itself, is the C<override> method modifier. override 'full_name' => sub { my $self = shift; super() . ', ' . $self->title }; This just tells Moose that I am intetionally overriding the superclass C<full_name> method here, and adding the value of the C<title> slot at the end of the employee's full name. And thats about it. Once again, as with all the other recipes, you can go about using these classes like any other Perl 5 class. A more detailed example of usage can be found in F<t/004_recipe.t>. =head1 CONCLUSION This recipe was intentionally longer and more complex to illustrate both how easily Moose classes can interact (using class type constraints, etc.) and the shear density of information and behaviors which Moose can pack into a relatively small amount of typing. Ponder for a moment how much more code a non-Moose plain old Perl 5 version of this recipe would have been (including all the type constraint checks, weak references, etc). And of course, this recipe also introduced the C<subtype> keyword, and it's usefulness within the Moose toolkit. In the next recipe we will focus more on subtypes, and introduce the idea of type coercion as well. =head1 FOOTNOTES =over 4 =item (1) The value being checked is also passed as the first argument to the C<where> block as well, so it can also be accessed as C<$_[0]> as well. =item (2) The C<BUILD> method is called by C<Moose::Object::BUILDALL>, which is called by C<Moose::Object::new>. C<BUILDALL> will climb the object inheritence graph and call the approriate C<BUILD> methods in the correct order. =back =head1 AUTHOR Stevan Little E<lt>stevan@iinteractive.comE<gt> =head1 COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE Copyright 2006 by Infinity Interactive, Inc. L<http://www.iinteractive.com> This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. =cut