-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TODO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- roles

Need to figure out the details of composite roles

- type unions

Add support for doing it with Classes which do not have 
a type constraint yet created

- type intersections

Mostly just for Roles

- inherited slot specs

[10:49] stevan	does can be added to,.. but not changed

- proxy attributes

[15:49] 	stevan	you want a proxied attribute
[15:49] 	stevan	which looks like an attribute, 
                    talks like an attribute, smells 
                    like an attribute,.. but if you 
                    look behind the curtain,.. its 
                    over there.. in that other object

- compile time extends

[00:39] 	sri	    but maybe a better syntax for compile time extends
[00:39] 	stevan	I have been pondering that actually
[00:39] 	sri	    use Moose extends => Foo::Bar
[00:40] 	stevan	I think now that we have the Sub::Exporter stuff 
                    in, that kinda thing should be pretty easy

nothingmuch notes that all the constructs should be supported in the entirety of the use clause:

    use Moose (
        has => foo (
            ....
        ),
    );

and that if this usage style is used nothing is exported to the namespace.

- default should dclone()

- subtype $anon_subtype => where { ... }

[22:56] 	stevan	sub mst_doesnt_like_to_type { (shift)->meta->attr->type_contstraint }
[22:57] 	mst	err
[22:57] 	stevan	:P
[22:57] 	stevan	are you wanting to reuse it or something?
[22:57] 	stevan	my $subtype = subtype 'Something' => where { ... };
[22:58] 	stevan	then you can do isa => $subtype 
[22:58] 	mst	but I can't subtype it again
[22:59] 	stevan	mst: ahhh... 
[22:59] 	mst	well, I can. but it suddenly gets very "long way round" ish
[23:00] 	stevan	my $constraint = Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint->new(
[23:00] 	stevan	            name       => $name || '__ANON__',
[23:00] 	stevan	            parent     => $parent,            
[23:00] 	stevan	            constraint => $check,       
[23:00] 	stevan	            message    => $message,    
[23:00] 	stevan	        );
[23:00] 	stevan	yeah thats kinda the long way
[23:00] 	stevan	mst: what would you like it to be?
[23:00] 	mst	$parent = find_type_constraint($parent) if defined $parent;
[23:00] 	mst	if $parent is already a type constraint
[23:00] 	mst	skip that bit
[23:00] 	stevan	hmm
[23:00] 	mst	should be all you need to change
[23:00] 	stevan	yeah
[23:01] 	stevan	so you can then say 
[23:01] 	stevan	subtype $anon => where { ... };
[23:01] 	mst	right
[23:01] 	stevan	ok

- method keyword

[23:37] 	mst	more seriously, I'd still like a "method" keyword or something
[23:37] 	mst	method 'foo' => sub { ... };
[23:38] 	stevan	what would it do more than sub foo { ... }?
[23:39] 	stevan	I would like multimethods actually
[23:39] 	mst	almost exactly nothing, to begin with
[23:39] 	stevan	but thats just cause I love CLOS and am reading a book on Dylan now
[23:40] 	stevan	keyword squating :)
[23:40] 	mst	but if we need to hook stuff later it's bloody handy to already have people writing it that way
[23:40] 	mst	right
...
[23:49] 	mst	oh, also: method 'has' => sub { ... } could squelch the redefine warning

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO PONDER
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Moose "strict" mode

use Moose 'strict'; This would allow us to have all sort of expensive tests
which can be turned off in prod.     
        
- Moose::Philosophy.pod

To explain Moose from a very high level

- moosedoc

We certainly have enough meta-information to make pretty complete POD docs.