Commit | Line | Data |
cb1a09d0 |
1 | =head1 NAME |
4633a7c4 |
2 | |
19799a22 |
3 | perllol - Manipulating Arrays of Arrays in Perl |
4633a7c4 |
4 | |
cb1a09d0 |
5 | =head1 DESCRIPTION |
6 | |
cea6626f |
7 | =head2 Declaration and Access of Arrays of Arrays |
4633a7c4 |
8 | |
d808f88a |
9 | The simplest thing to build is an array of arrays (sometimes imprecisely |
19799a22 |
10 | called a list of lists). It's reasonably easy to understand, and |
11 | almost everything that applies here will also be applicable later |
12 | on with the fancier data structures. |
4633a7c4 |
13 | |
19799a22 |
14 | An array of an array is just a regular old array @AoA that you can |
15 | get at with two subscripts, like C<$AoA[3][2]>. Here's a declaration |
16 | of the array: |
4633a7c4 |
17 | |
19799a22 |
18 | # assign to our array, an array of array references |
19 | @AoA = ( |
4633a7c4 |
20 | [ "fred", "barney" ], |
21 | [ "george", "jane", "elroy" ], |
22 | [ "homer", "marge", "bart" ], |
23 | ); |
24 | |
19799a22 |
25 | print $AoA[2][2]; |
4633a7c4 |
26 | bart |
27 | |
28 | Now you should be very careful that the outer bracket type |
5a964f20 |
29 | is a round one, that is, a parenthesis. That's because you're assigning to |
19799a22 |
30 | an @array, so you need parentheses. If you wanted there I<not> to be an @AoA, |
4633a7c4 |
31 | but rather just a reference to it, you could do something more like this: |
32 | |
19799a22 |
33 | # assign a reference to array of array references |
34 | $ref_to_AoA = [ |
4633a7c4 |
35 | [ "fred", "barney", "pebbles", "bambam", "dino", ], |
36 | [ "homer", "bart", "marge", "maggie", ], |
c2611fb3 |
37 | [ "george", "jane", "elroy", "judy", ], |
4633a7c4 |
38 | ]; |
39 | |
19799a22 |
40 | print $ref_to_AoA->[2][2]; |
4633a7c4 |
41 | |
54310121 |
42 | Notice that the outer bracket type has changed, and so our access syntax |
4633a7c4 |
43 | has also changed. That's because unlike C, in perl you can't freely |
19799a22 |
44 | interchange arrays and references thereto. $ref_to_AoA is a reference to an |
45 | array, whereas @AoA is an array proper. Likewise, C<$AoA[2]> is not an |
4633a7c4 |
46 | array, but an array ref. So how come you can write these: |
47 | |
19799a22 |
48 | $AoA[2][2] |
49 | $ref_to_AoA->[2][2] |
4633a7c4 |
50 | |
51 | instead of having to write these: |
52 | |
19799a22 |
53 | $AoA[2]->[2] |
54 | $ref_to_AoA->[2]->[2] |
4633a7c4 |
55 | |
56 | Well, that's because the rule is that on adjacent brackets only (whether |
1fef88e7 |
57 | square or curly), you are free to omit the pointer dereferencing arrow. |
4d9142af |
58 | But you cannot do so for the very first one if it's a scalar containing |
19799a22 |
59 | a reference, which means that $ref_to_AoA always needs it. |
4633a7c4 |
60 | |
cea6626f |
61 | =head2 Growing Your Own |
4633a7c4 |
62 | |
63 | That's all well and good for declaration of a fixed data structure, |
64 | but what if you wanted to add new elements on the fly, or build |
65 | it up entirely from scratch? |
66 | |
67 | First, let's look at reading it in from a file. This is something like |
68 | adding a row at a time. We'll assume that there's a flat file in which |
69 | each line is a row and each word an element. If you're trying to develop an |
19799a22 |
70 | @AoA array containing all these, here's the right way to do that: |
4633a7c4 |
71 | |
72 | while (<>) { |
73 | @tmp = split; |
19799a22 |
74 | push @AoA, [ @tmp ]; |
54310121 |
75 | } |
4633a7c4 |
76 | |
77 | You might also have loaded that from a function: |
78 | |
79 | for $i ( 1 .. 10 ) { |
19799a22 |
80 | $AoA[$i] = [ somefunc($i) ]; |
4633a7c4 |
81 | } |
82 | |
83 | Or you might have had a temporary variable sitting around with the |
19799a22 |
84 | array in it. |
4633a7c4 |
85 | |
86 | for $i ( 1 .. 10 ) { |
87 | @tmp = somefunc($i); |
19799a22 |
88 | $AoA[$i] = [ @tmp ]; |
4633a7c4 |
89 | } |
90 | |
19799a22 |
91 | It's very important that you make sure to use the C<[]> array reference |
4633a7c4 |
92 | constructor. That's because this will be very wrong: |
93 | |
19799a22 |
94 | $AoA[$i] = @tmp; |
4633a7c4 |
95 | |
19799a22 |
96 | You see, assigning a named array like that to a scalar just counts the |
54310121 |
97 | number of elements in @tmp, which probably isn't what you want. |
4633a7c4 |
98 | |
99 | If you are running under C<use strict>, you'll have to add some |
100 | declarations to make it happy: |
101 | |
102 | use strict; |
19799a22 |
103 | my(@AoA, @tmp); |
4633a7c4 |
104 | while (<>) { |
105 | @tmp = split; |
19799a22 |
106 | push @AoA, [ @tmp ]; |
54310121 |
107 | } |
4633a7c4 |
108 | |
109 | Of course, you don't need the temporary array to have a name at all: |
110 | |
111 | while (<>) { |
19799a22 |
112 | push @AoA, [ split ]; |
54310121 |
113 | } |
4633a7c4 |
114 | |
115 | You also don't have to use push(). You could just make a direct assignment |
116 | if you knew where you wanted to put it: |
117 | |
19799a22 |
118 | my (@AoA, $i, $line); |
1fef88e7 |
119 | for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) { |
4633a7c4 |
120 | $line = <>; |
19799a22 |
121 | $AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', $line ]; |
54310121 |
122 | } |
4633a7c4 |
123 | |
124 | or even just |
125 | |
19799a22 |
126 | my (@AoA, $i); |
1fef88e7 |
127 | for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) { |
19799a22 |
128 | $AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', <> ]; |
54310121 |
129 | } |
4633a7c4 |
130 | |
19799a22 |
131 | You should in general be leery of using functions that could |
132 | potentially return lists in scalar context without explicitly stating |
133 | such. This would be clearer to the casual reader: |
4633a7c4 |
134 | |
19799a22 |
135 | my (@AoA, $i); |
1fef88e7 |
136 | for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) { |
19799a22 |
137 | $AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', scalar(<>) ]; |
54310121 |
138 | } |
4633a7c4 |
139 | |
19799a22 |
140 | If you wanted to have a $ref_to_AoA variable as a reference to an array, |
4633a7c4 |
141 | you'd have to do something like this: |
142 | |
143 | while (<>) { |
19799a22 |
144 | push @$ref_to_AoA, [ split ]; |
54310121 |
145 | } |
4633a7c4 |
146 | |
5a964f20 |
147 | Now you can add new rows. What about adding new columns? If you're |
5f05dabc |
148 | dealing with just matrices, it's often easiest to use simple assignment: |
4633a7c4 |
149 | |
150 | for $x (1 .. 10) { |
151 | for $y (1 .. 10) { |
19799a22 |
152 | $AoA[$x][$y] = func($x, $y); |
4633a7c4 |
153 | } |
154 | } |
155 | |
156 | for $x ( 3, 7, 9 ) { |
19799a22 |
157 | $AoA[$x][20] += func2($x); |
54310121 |
158 | } |
4633a7c4 |
159 | |
54310121 |
160 | It doesn't matter whether those elements are already |
4633a7c4 |
161 | there or not: it'll gladly create them for you, setting |
162 | intervening elements to C<undef> as need be. |
163 | |
5f05dabc |
164 | If you wanted just to append to a row, you'd have |
4633a7c4 |
165 | to do something a bit funnier looking: |
166 | |
167 | # add new columns to an existing row |
19799a22 |
168 | push @{ $AoA[0] }, "wilma", "betty"; |
4633a7c4 |
169 | |
5f05dabc |
170 | Notice that I I<couldn't> say just: |
4633a7c4 |
171 | |
19799a22 |
172 | push $AoA[0], "wilma", "betty"; # WRONG! |
4633a7c4 |
173 | |
174 | In fact, that wouldn't even compile. How come? Because the argument |
175 | to push() must be a real array, not just a reference to such. |
176 | |
cea6626f |
177 | =head2 Access and Printing |
4633a7c4 |
178 | |
54310121 |
179 | Now it's time to print your data structure out. How |
5f05dabc |
180 | are you going to do that? Well, if you want only one |
4633a7c4 |
181 | of the elements, it's trivial: |
182 | |
19799a22 |
183 | print $AoA[0][0]; |
4633a7c4 |
184 | |
185 | If you want to print the whole thing, though, you can't |
5f05dabc |
186 | say |
4633a7c4 |
187 | |
19799a22 |
188 | print @AoA; # WRONG |
4633a7c4 |
189 | |
5f05dabc |
190 | because you'll get just references listed, and perl will never |
54310121 |
191 | automatically dereference things for you. Instead, you have to |
4633a7c4 |
192 | roll yourself a loop or two. This prints the whole structure, |
193 | using the shell-style for() construct to loop across the outer |
54310121 |
194 | set of subscripts. |
4633a7c4 |
195 | |
19799a22 |
196 | for $aref ( @AoA ) { |
4633a7c4 |
197 | print "\t [ @$aref ],\n"; |
198 | } |
199 | |
200 | If you wanted to keep track of subscripts, you might do this: |
201 | |
19799a22 |
202 | for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) { |
203 | print "\t elt $i is [ @{$AoA[$i]} ],\n"; |
4633a7c4 |
204 | } |
205 | |
206 | or maybe even this. Notice the inner loop. |
207 | |
19799a22 |
208 | for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) { |
209 | for $j ( 0 .. $#{$AoA[$i]} ) { |
210 | print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n"; |
4633a7c4 |
211 | } |
212 | } |
213 | |
54310121 |
214 | As you can see, it's getting a bit complicated. That's why |
4633a7c4 |
215 | sometimes is easier to take a temporary on your way through: |
216 | |
19799a22 |
217 | for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) { |
218 | $aref = $AoA[$i]; |
4633a7c4 |
219 | for $j ( 0 .. $#{$aref} ) { |
19799a22 |
220 | print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n"; |
4633a7c4 |
221 | } |
222 | } |
223 | |
5f05dabc |
224 | Hmm... that's still a bit ugly. How about this: |
4633a7c4 |
225 | |
19799a22 |
226 | for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) { |
227 | $aref = $AoA[$i]; |
4633a7c4 |
228 | $n = @$aref - 1; |
229 | for $j ( 0 .. $n ) { |
19799a22 |
230 | print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n"; |
4633a7c4 |
231 | } |
232 | } |
233 | |
cea6626f |
234 | =head2 Slices |
4633a7c4 |
235 | |
4d9142af |
236 | If you want to get at a slice (part of a row) in a multidimensional |
4633a7c4 |
237 | array, you're going to have to do some fancy subscripting. That's |
238 | because while we have a nice synonym for single elements via the |
239 | pointer arrow for dereferencing, no such convenience exists for slices. |
240 | (Remember, of course, that you can always write a loop to do a slice |
241 | operation.) |
242 | |
19799a22 |
243 | Here's how to do one operation using a loop. We'll assume an @AoA |
4633a7c4 |
244 | variable as before. |
245 | |
246 | @part = (); |
54310121 |
247 | $x = 4; |
4633a7c4 |
248 | for ($y = 7; $y < 13; $y++) { |
19799a22 |
249 | push @part, $AoA[$x][$y]; |
54310121 |
250 | } |
4633a7c4 |
251 | |
252 | That same loop could be replaced with a slice operation: |
253 | |
19799a22 |
254 | @part = @{ $AoA[4] } [ 7..12 ]; |
4633a7c4 |
255 | |
256 | but as you might well imagine, this is pretty rough on the reader. |
257 | |
258 | Ah, but what if you wanted a I<two-dimensional slice>, such as having |
5f05dabc |
259 | $x run from 4..8 and $y run from 7 to 12? Hmm... here's the simple way: |
4633a7c4 |
260 | |
19799a22 |
261 | @newAoA = (); |
4633a7c4 |
262 | for ($startx = $x = 4; $x <= 8; $x++) { |
3e3baf6d |
263 | for ($starty = $y = 7; $y <= 12; $y++) { |
19799a22 |
264 | $newAoA[$x - $startx][$y - $starty] = $AoA[$x][$y]; |
4633a7c4 |
265 | } |
54310121 |
266 | } |
4633a7c4 |
267 | |
54310121 |
268 | We can reduce some of the looping through slices |
4633a7c4 |
269 | |
270 | for ($x = 4; $x <= 8; $x++) { |
19799a22 |
271 | push @newAoA, [ @{ $AoA[$x] } [ 7..12 ] ]; |
4633a7c4 |
272 | } |
273 | |
274 | If you were into Schwartzian Transforms, you would probably |
275 | have selected map for that |
276 | |
19799a22 |
277 | @newAoA = map { [ @{ $AoA[$_] } [ 7..12 ] ] } 4 .. 8; |
4633a7c4 |
278 | |
279 | Although if your manager accused of seeking job security (or rapid |
280 | insecurity) through inscrutable code, it would be hard to argue. :-) |
281 | If I were you, I'd put that in a function: |
282 | |
19799a22 |
283 | @newAoA = splice_2D( \@AoA, 4 => 8, 7 => 12 ); |
4633a7c4 |
284 | sub splice_2D { |
19799a22 |
285 | my $lrr = shift; # ref to array of array refs! |
54310121 |
286 | my ($x_lo, $x_hi, |
4633a7c4 |
287 | $y_lo, $y_hi) = @_; |
288 | |
54310121 |
289 | return map { |
290 | [ @{ $lrr->[$_] } [ $y_lo .. $y_hi ] ] |
4633a7c4 |
291 | } $x_lo .. $x_hi; |
54310121 |
292 | } |
4633a7c4 |
293 | |
294 | |
4633a7c4 |
295 | =head1 SEE ALSO |
296 | |
297 | perldata(1), perlref(1), perldsc(1) |
298 | |
299 | =head1 AUTHOR |
300 | |
9607fc9c |
301 | Tom Christiansen <F<tchrist@perl.com>> |
4633a7c4 |
302 | |
5a964f20 |
303 | Last update: Thu Jun 4 16:16:23 MDT 1998 |