Should detect if we're in a checkout. I'm still not happy with this
[catagits/Catalyst-Devel.git] / gsoc / gsoc-devel-plan-5-23.txt
CommitLineData
01dfb279 115:36 <t0m> right. so the first thing to do is probably write a test to check
2 generating an application doesn't change.
315:37 <dhoss> per app?
415:38 <t0m> no, I mean whilst you're ripping ::Helper apart.
515:38 <dhoss> OH
615:38 <dhoss> gotcha
715:38 <t0m> if you install your branch.. Then catalyst.pl t/TestAppForComparison
815:39 <dhoss> so we have the same results now as before, yes?
915:39 <t0m> then you write a test which says catalyst.pl /tmp/TempTestApp; my
10 $diff = `diff -urN t/TestAppForComparison /tmp/TempTestApp`; ok
11 !length($diff) or warn $diff;
1215:40 <t0m> exactly. and that'll test you rip all of the files out of Helper.pm
13 correctly..
1415:40 <dhoss> okay, TestAppForComparison created. i'll commit that initial
15 version
1615:40 <t0m> you'll probably want to nuke it after that, as testing the
17 generated strings of an entire app dir is gonna be a PITA
1815:41 <t0m> to maintain
1915:41 <dhoss> i could see that
2015:41 <t0m> But it's totally the right solution whilst you're trying to rip
21 stuff out without changing it
2215:41 <dhoss> temp testing :-D
2315:44 <t0m> I've got some ideas on doing better testing that the TestApp we
24 generate is good.
2515:44 <t0m> but they're a bit more involved, and not needed for this at all ;)
2615:45 <dhoss> this being this refactor, or this bit of the refactor?
2715:45 <t0m> the latter.
2815:45 <dhoss> okay - got it
2915:46 <t0m> and once this is done - you can branch again to work on the code,
30 and again to work on the generated app templates (as we'll want to
31 moosify those, so your app is moosetastic by default
3215:46 <t0m> and as it's all in different files - you can do both in parallel as
33 you feel like and safely merge back
3415:47 <t0m> did you get to grips with MX::GetOpt and do you have a plan for
35 that yet?
3615:48 <dhoss> so one branch for helper_refactor, one for code (which code?),
37 and one for app templates
3815:48 <t0m> As I guess catalyst.pl should be taught to use it, and so should
39 the generated scripts :)
4015:48 <dhoss> i've been playing with MX::GetOpt, i need a few more details on
41 what exactly needs to be beat up
4215:48 <t0m> yy, but you branch from completed helper_refactor :)
4315:49 <t0m> and 'code' is the actual refactor / api changes for helpers
4415:49 <t0m> bletch
4515:50 <dhoss> okay, so the 'code' branch will be simply the C::H code branched
46 from helper_refactor
4715:50 <t0m> get_file has to keep working as everything using ::Helper needs it
4815:50 <t0m> yes, exactly.
4915:51 <t0m> so you need to make a get_file_from_sharedir function or something
5015:51 <dhoss> okay, making sense now :-)
5115:51 <t0m> and change things over to use that.
5215:51 <t0m> that's fine though - means you can extract 1 file at a time
5315:52 <dhoss> which would be better, no? better atomicity and for testing
5415:52 <t0m> yy
5515:52 <t0m> bletch was at the fact that 'get_file' is a good method name, and
56 it's now deprecated
5715:53 <dhoss> is that in C::H?
5815:53 <t0m> yy
5915:53 * dhoss is a little behind in my api knowledge
6015:53 <dhoss> off the top of my head at least
6115:53 <t0m> it's the 'get me a file out the <DATA> section' method
6215:53 <dhoss> aha right
6315:54 <t0m> which you're replacing in favour of 'get me a file out of the share
64 dir'
6515:54 <t0m> and 'copy file out of sharedir' methods.
6615:54 <t0m> The former for templates
6715:54 <t0m> the latter for binaries, which gets rid of the hateful decoding and
68 writing out business
6915:54 <dhoss> get -> we're going to interpolate shit, copy -> we're giong to
70 use directly?
7115:55 <t0m> just so
7215:55 <t0m> eliminating the 'please turn this giant hex string back into
73 binary' thing
7415:55 <dhoss> definitely :-P
7516:00 <t0m> sub _mk_favicon {
7616:00 <t0m> my ( $self ) = @_;
7716:00 <t0m> $self->copy_share_file(
7816:00 <t0m> File::Spec->catfile( ( caller(0) )[0], 'favicon.ico' ),
7916:00 <t0m> File::Spec->catfile( $self->{root}, "favicon.ico" )
8016:00 <t0m> );
8116:00 <t0m> }
8216:00 <t0m> sumfin like dat
8316:01 <dhoss> easy enough
8416:01 <t0m> the actually, all the caller crap dies too
8516:02 <dhoss> hrm, i suppose we have to keep the atrocious
86 Class::Accessor::Fast method name artifacts?
8716:02 <t0m> that's to clue get_file what file to borg crap out off
8816:03 <t0m> I vote that most of them can burn, as we'll be working out what
89 shit to copy a lot more dynamically
9016:03 <t0m> and the ones which can't get deprecated, but preserved.
9116:04 <dhoss> so that's just for the current get_file, right?
9216:04 <t0m> yy
9316:04 <t0m> $self->copy_share_file(
9416:04 <t0m> 'favicon.ico',
9516:04 <t0m> File::Spec->catfile( $self->{root}, "favicon.ico" )
9616:04 <t0m> );
9716:05 <t0m> more like it
9816:05 <t0m> so we have sub mk_foo { shift->generate_foo(@_); }
99
c5387711 100====
1015-28
10203:04 < dhoss> SO. official next step: 1) trim crap out 2) write test for how
103 helpers are invoking Catalyst::Helper 3)??? 4) profit!
10403:05 < t0m> 3) Re arrange files in sharedir so we can make the comversion guts
105 totally generic
10603:05 < t0m> 4) merge&profit
10703:05 < t0m> *conversion
10803:05 < dhoss> rearrange meaning mv foo MyApp?
10903:06 < t0m> erm, yes, as described above, so that the contents of share/ is
110 laid out the same as a newly generated MyApp
11103:06 < dhoss> OH
11203:06 < dhoss> okay
11303:06 < dhoss> instead of my current fuckery :-)
11403:06 < dhoss> autarch: btw if you have an idea for that i'd love an email to
115 the one in topic
11603:06 < t0m> cause then the entire generate application becomes 'copy this
117 directory from X => Y, applying some file mangling rules)
118
119